The End of Average
Tags: #psychology #education #business #individuality #talent #success #innovation
Authors: Todd Rose
_thumbnail.jpg)
Overview
In “The End of Average,” I challenge the deeply ingrained belief that success is best measured and understood through the lens of “average.” I argue that the concept of the average, while useful for comparing groups, is fundamentally flawed when applied to individuals. I call this the “tyranny of the average,” showing how it has led to the creation of standardized systems in education, business, and beyond that fail to account for individual differences and often stifle individual potential. I introduce three core principles of individuality - jaggedness, context, and pathways - that offer a powerful framework for understanding and empowering individuals. These principles challenge traditional notions of talent, personality, and development, revealing that individuals are far more complex and adaptable than standardized systems assume. By embracing these principles, we can create more personalized and effective systems in education, design more engaging and empowering workplaces, and cultivate a society that values and supports individual excellence. This book is a call to action for individuals, educators, business leaders, and policymakers to embrace the science of the individual, challenging them to design systems that fit people rather than forcing people to fit systems. My goal is to usher in an “Age of Individuals” where everyone has the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Book Outline
1. Introduction: The Look-Alike Competition
This chapter introduces the core problem of designing systems around the concept of the “average person.” Using the example of 1940s Air Force cockpit design, it demonstrates how relying on average measurements can lead to systems that don’t fit anyone. The principle of individual fit is presented as the solution, emphasizing the importance of designing systems that adapt to the unique characteristics of individuals.
Key concept: The Air Force’s struggle to design cockpits for pilots in the 1940s highlights a fundamental flaw in designing for the “average person.” The study conducted by Lieutenant Gilbert S. Daniels revealed that not a single pilot fit within the average range of all measured dimensions, proving that designing for the “average” actually fits no one. This laid the groundwork for the principle of individual fit - designing systems to fit individuals rather than the other way around.
2. Chapter 1: The Invention of the Average
This chapter explores the historical roots of the “Age of Average,” focusing on the work of Adolphe Quetelet. It details how Quetelet’s statistical methods, initially developed for astronomy, were applied to human data, leading to the creation of the “Average Man” concept. This concept became a foundational principle for understanding and managing societies, laying the groundwork for standardized systems that often fail to account for individual differences.
Key concept: “Individual talent is too sporadic and unpredictable to be allowed any important part in the organization of society. Social systems which endure are built on the average person who can be trained to occupy any position adequately if not brilliantly.” - Stuart Chase, The Proper Study of Mankind. This quote exemplifies the prevailing mindset of the “Age of Average,” where standardization and conformity were prioritized over individual talent. This chapter explores the origins of this mindset, tracing it back to Adolphe Quetelet’s development of the “Average Man” concept and its application to social sciences.
3. Chapter 2: How Our World Became Standardized
This chapter explains how the “Age of Average” took hold in the workplace through the influence of Frederick Winslow Taylor and his principles of scientific management. It highlights Taylor’s emphasis on standardization, efficiency, and the prioritization of systems over individual workers. It describes how Taylor’s ideas led to the creation of the modern manager and the widespread adoption of standardized processes in various industries, ultimately shaping the way work is organized in many sectors today.
Key concept: Frederick Winslow Taylor, a pioneer of scientific management, advocated for standardizing industrial processes around the average worker. His famous quote, “In the past the man was first, in the future the system must be first,” captures the essence of his philosophy, prioritizing efficiency and standardization over individual worker initiative or unique skills. This chapter examines how Taylor’s ideas transformed the workplace, leading to the rise of hierarchical management structures and the widespread adoption of standardized processes.
4. Chapter 3: Overthrowing the Average
This chapter introduces the work of Peter Molenaar and his groundbreaking critique of the “Age of Average” in scientific research. It explains the concept of the “ergodic switch,” highlighting the flawed assumption that averaging data across individuals provides accurate insights into individual behavior. It argues for a “science of the individual” that focuses on understanding and analyzing individual patterns, recognizing the dynamic and ever-changing nature of human traits and behavior.
Key concept: The “ergodic switch” is a term coined by Peter Molenaar to describe the erroneous assumption that group averages can be used to understand and predict individual behavior. This assumption, central to many scientific fields and organizational practices, ignores the dynamic and ever-changing nature of individuals. This chapter delves into Molenaar’s work, highlighting the limitations of traditional statistical methods and advocating for a shift towards a “science of the individual.”
5. Chapter 4: Talent Is Always Jagged
This chapter introduces the first principle of individuality: the “jaggedness principle.” It explains how human talent is multidimensional and often consists of weakly correlated skills or abilities. Using examples from basketball team selection and intelligence testing, it demonstrates how attempting to measure talent on a single scale (like points per game or IQ score) fails to capture the complex and multifaceted nature of individual abilities. This principle highlights the limitations of one-dimensional thinking in talent evaluation.
Key concept: The “jaggedness principle” states that human talent is multidimensional and the various dimensions are often weakly correlated. It challenges the idea of ranking individuals on a single scale, arguing that talent cannot be accurately represented by a single number or score. This chapter uses examples from basketball team performance and intelligence testing to illustrate how one-dimensional thinking can lead to flawed talent evaluations.
6. Chapter 5: Traits Are a Myth
This chapter introduces the second principle of individuality: the “context principle.” It explains how human behavior is deeply influenced by context and that individuals do not possess stable personality traits that manifest consistently across all situations. It highlights the work of Yuichi Shoda and his groundbreaking research on children’s behavior, demonstrating how individuals exhibit different personalities depending on the specific context. This principle challenges the reliance on essentialist thinking about personality and advocates for understanding individuals through their unique “if-then signatures” - a framework that captures context-specific behavioral patterns.
Key concept: Yuichi Shoda’s research on children’s behavior at a summer camp revealed that individuals exhibited different personalities in different situations. This research led to the development of “if-then signatures” - a way of understanding personality as a set of context-specific behaviors rather than a set of fixed traits. This chapter explores the limitations of traditional trait-based personality assessments and argues for the importance of understanding individuals in the context of their specific situations.
7. Chapter 6: We All Walk the Road Less Traveled
This chapter introduces the third principle of individuality: the “pathways principle.” It challenges the notion of a single “normal” pathway of development for any skill or ability, arguing that individuals follow unique trajectories to reach their goals. Using examples from infant motor development, career paths in science, and learning pace in education, it emphasizes the importance of embracing individual differences in the pace and sequence of development. This principle encourages moving away from standardized timelines and benchmarks and towards personalized approaches that respect the unique pathways individuals take to achieve success.
Key concept: “Every baby solves the problem of movement in her own unique way.” - Karen Adolph. This quote, from a leading researcher in infant development, encapsulates the “pathways principle” - the idea that there are multiple, equally valid pathways to achieving a goal. This chapter dismantles the concept of a single “normal” pathway, using examples like infant crawling and career progression to show how individuals follow unique developmental trajectories. It also highlights the fallacy of equating speed of learning with learning ability.
8. Chapter 7: When Businesses Commit to Individuality
This chapter focuses on how businesses can benefit from embracing the principles of individuality. It highlights successful examples like Costco, Zoho, and Morning Star, showing how these companies have implemented practices that value and empower individual workers. It contrasts these approaches with traditional Taylorist models, demonstrating how prioritizing individual fit, context-specific performance, and personalized career pathways can lead to increased employee engagement, loyalty, and innovation, ultimately resulting in superior business outcomes.
Key concept: “You cannot run a company like Costco without thinking about individuals. Period. You can make money the other way, but you cannot create a place where everyone wins.” - Jim Sinegal, Founder of Costco. This quote underscores the benefits of embracing individual differences in the workplace. This chapter explores how companies like Costco, Zoho, and Morning Star have successfully implemented the principles of individuality, leading to high employee engagement, innovation, and superior business results. It challenges the prevailing Taylorist model that prioritizes standardized systems over individual worker initiative.
9. Chapter 8: Replacing the Average in Higher Education
This chapter tackles the limitations of the current higher education system, arguing that its standardized and averagarian structure fails to adequately prepare students for careers in the 21st century. It proposes a three-part solution: replacing diplomas with credentials, substituting competency-based evaluations for grades, and allowing students to determine their own educational pathways. It explains how this approach could create a more personalized and effective higher education system that better meets the needs of both students and employers, ultimately leading to a better match between skills learned and skills required in the workforce.
Key concept: “Grant credentials, not diplomas. Replace grades with competency. Let students determine their educational pathway.” This three-pronged approach provides a blueprint for transforming the current averagarian higher education system into one that is individualized, flexible, and responsive to the needs of both students and employers. This chapter details how such a system could work and highlights institutions that are already implementing aspects of this approach.
10. Chapter 9: Redefining Opportunity
This chapter introduces the concept of “equal fit” as a framework for redefining opportunity. It uses the compelling story of Captain Kim Campbell, a pilot who defied the odds by successfully landing a heavily damaged plane, to illustrate how individuals can excel when placed in environments that match their unique capabilities. It argues that achieving true equality of opportunity requires moving beyond the concept of “equal access” and instead focusing on creating systems and environments that are responsive to individual differences. This principle has profound implications for designing everything from educational programs to workplaces, ensuring that individuals have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Key concept: The story of Captain Kim Campbell, an undersized pilot who successfully landed a damaged A-10 Warthog using manual controls, exemplifies the principle of “equal fit.” This principle argues that true opportunity arises when individuals are in environments that match their unique abilities and characteristics. This chapter explores how the concept of “equal fit” can be applied to various social institutions, advocating for a shift from “equal access” to a system where individual differences are recognized and accommodated.
Essential Questions
1. What is the “tyranny of the average” and how does it impact individuals and society?
The “tyranny of the average” refers to the limitations imposed by systems designed around the average person. This tyranny arises from the flawed assumption that the average represents the ideal, leading to standardized systems in education, healthcare, business, and beyond that fail to account for individual variations. This reliance on averages often results in systems that don’t fit anyone well, stifling individual potential and hindering innovation.
2. What are the three principles of individuality, and how do they challenge the concept of “average”?
The three principles of individuality - jaggedness, context, and pathways - offer a framework for understanding individual differences. The jaggedness principle states that human talent is multidimensional and cannot be accurately represented by a single score. The context principle emphasizes the importance of considering the specific situation when evaluating behavior, as individuals exhibit different personalities in different contexts. The pathways principle recognizes that there are multiple, equally valid pathways to success, and individuals develop at their own pace and in their own unique way.
3. How can businesses benefit from embracing individuality?
Businesses can benefit from embracing individuality by designing jobs and work environments that cater to individual strengths and preferences. By focusing on individual fit, allowing employees to leverage their unique skills and talents, and offering flexible career pathways, businesses can foster greater employee engagement, loyalty, and innovation. Companies like Costco, Zoho, and Morning Star demonstrate that prioritizing individuality can lead to both employee and organizational success.
4. How can higher education be redesigned to better serve the needs of individual students?
The current higher education system, built on the principles of standardization and ranking, often fails to meet the needs of both students and employers. A more effective system would prioritize competency-based education, grant credentials for specific skills and knowledge rather than diplomas, and allow students to determine their own learning pace and pathway. This approach would better prepare graduates for the workforce, reduce the burden of student debt, and foster individual growth and exploration.
5. What is the principle of “equal fit,” and how can it be used to create more equitable opportunities?
The principle of “equal fit” advocates for creating opportunities that align with individuals’ unique talents and abilities. This means designing systems and environments that accommodate individual differences rather than forcing individuals to conform to a standardized model. By shifting our focus from “equal access” to “equal fit,” we can create a society where everyone has a genuine chance to reach their full potential.
Key Takeaways
1. Human Talent is Jagged
The jaggedness principle underscores the multifaceted nature of talent. Relying solely on traditional metrics like GPA or standardized test scores fails to capture the full picture of an individual’s abilities. Recognizing that individuals have a unique combination of strengths and weaknesses allows for a more holistic evaluation of their potential.
Practical Application:
In a hiring process, instead of focusing on GPA or years of experience, an AI company could design assessments that evaluate candidates’ problem-solving abilities in real-world scenarios relevant to the job, allowing for a more accurate assessment of their potential for success.
2. Context Matters
Human behavior is not determined solely by personality traits but emerges from the interaction between an individual and their specific context. Understanding an individual’s “if-then” signatures, or context-specific behavior patterns, is crucial for predicting and influencing behavior.
Practical Application:
An AI assistant designed for personal productivity could be programmed to learn and adapt to each user’s unique work habits and preferences, tailoring its responses and suggestions to specific contexts, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.
3. Embrace Multiple Pathways to Success
This principle challenges the notion of a single “normal” pathway for learning or development. It highlights the importance of allowing individuals to learn at their own pace and follow a sequence that aligns with their unique strengths, interests, and learning style.
Practical Application:
An online learning platform could use AI to tailor the learning pace and sequence of each student based on their individual learning style, strengths, and weaknesses, allowing them to progress at a pace that suits them best.
Suggested Deep Dive
Chapter: Chapter 7: When Businesses Commit to Individuality
This chapter provides tangible, real-world examples of how businesses across different sectors have successfully implemented the principles of individuality to improve employee engagement, drive innovation, and enhance overall performance. It offers valuable insights for AI product engineers who want to understand how these principles can be applied in a practical setting.
Memorable Quotes
Introduction. 8
“If you’ve designed a cockpit to fit the average pilot, you’ve actually designed it to fit no one.”
Introduction. 15
“Any system designed around the average person is doomed to fail.”
Chapter 1. 22
“There is no such thing as an Average Brain.”
Chapter 4. 85
“Quality is more important than equality.”
Chapter 6. 106
“Every baby solves the problem of movement in her own unique way.”
Comparative Analysis
This book complements works like “Outliers” by Malcolm Gladwell, which explores the role of opportunity and circumstance in achieving success. Both books challenge the idea of innate talent as the sole driver of success, recognizing the influence of external factors. “The End of Average” goes a step further by providing a scientific framework, rooted in the principles of individuality, for understanding and leveraging these individual differences. It also aligns with the ideas presented in “Mindset” by Carol Dweck, which emphasizes the importance of a growth mindset. The “pathways principle” aligns with Dweck’s belief that abilities are not fixed but can be developed through effort and learning. Unlike books focused on individual success strategies, “The End of Average” offers a blueprint for systemic change, proposing the redesign of institutions like schools and workplaces to better accommodate individual differences, a concept explored in “A Whole New Mind” by Daniel Pink.
Reflection
While “The End of Average” makes a compelling case for embracing individuality, it’s important to acknowledge potential limitations. The book’s strength lies in its compelling storytelling, insightful analysis of scientific research, and its call for a paradigm shift in how we design systems. However, one could argue that it might oversimplify the complexities of social and organizational change. Implementing the principles of individuality requires a fundamental shift in mindset and may encounter resistance from those invested in existing systems. Furthermore, collecting and analyzing individual data raises ethical considerations around privacy and potential misuse. Despite these challenges, the book’s central message remains crucial: Recognizing and respecting individual differences is essential for creating a more just, equitable, and prosperous society. “The End of Average” serves as a powerful reminder that focusing on the individual, not the average, is the key to unlocking human potential.
Flashcards
What is the aim of public education, according to H.L. Mencken in 1924?
The tendency to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality.
What is the main assumption of the science of the individual?
Individuality matters. The individual is not error.
What is the counterintuitive conclusion that serves as the cornerstone of the book?
Any system designed around the average person is doomed to fail.
What is the “ergodic switch”?
It is the erroneous assumption that group averages can be used to understand and predict individual behavior.
What is the jaggedness principle?
Human talent is multidimensional and the various dimensions are often weakly correlated.
What is the context principle?
Individual behavior cannot be explained or predicted apart from a particular situation.
What is the first affirmation of the pathways principle?
In all aspects of our lives and for any given goal, there are many, equally valid ways to reach the same outcome.
What is the second affirmation of the pathways principle?
The particular pathway that is optimal for you depends on your own individuality.
What are the three key concepts to transform the higher education system?
Grant credentials, not diplomas. Replace grades with competency. Let students determine their educational pathway.
What is the lesson of Kim Campbell?
Fit creates opportunity.